miamidolphins
Average Joe
League Moderator
Miami Dolphins 2011!
Posts: 2,069
|
Post by miamidolphins on Oct 29, 2010 17:51:31 GMT -5
Dolphins Trade: -RB Chester Taylor (2010-13: $0.955 M) -LB Jonathen Goff $0.47 million (2012) -QB Max Hall (2010: $7.5 mil)
Packers Trade: -RB Knowshon Moreno---$0.40M(10)/ $1M(11)/ $0.855M(12)/ $1.7M(13)/ $1.31M(14)
I got what I want, he got what he wants, that is the point of a trade correct? Accept
|
|
|
Post by erok11 on Oct 29, 2010 17:53:28 GMT -5
so many injuries....need it....accept
|
|
|
Post by marioskazbah on Oct 29, 2010 17:55:27 GMT -5
LOL John for the amount of trades ive made that youve vetoed you have not earned the right to say 'I got what I want, he got what he wants, that is the point of a trade correct?' Cuz if you actually believed that, you wouldnt veto. Approved.
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Oct 29, 2010 18:47:47 GMT -5
Sorry but Veto John, Taylor is a backup, Goff is an Abundant LB and Hall is a one year deal, so rather useless, also considering he sucks anyways, Moreno is a beast and the man in Denver, he has just been injured this year, he will be a monster next year and the end of this year
|
|
|
Post by Carolina Panthers on Oct 29, 2010 20:50:32 GMT -5
APPROVE
|
|
|
Post by DC634~Jaguars on Oct 29, 2010 21:09:03 GMT -5
A Backup RB, A mediocre LB,and a sucky rookie QB who lost the starting job, and only has a 1 yr contract...
A RB that has been hurt by injuries, but still has so much more value then the 3 he is being traded for...I dont believe this needs a long explanation...
Veto
|
|
|
Post by Kansas on Oct 29, 2010 21:18:29 GMT -5
Only thing that stands out more than this being just a shitty trade is that the Packers will lose Max Hall after this season. He is signed longer IRL than here as a FA pickup. Moreno is worth more than this IMO. Its a great trade for John. But not so great for Eric.
VETO.
|
|
|
Post by Indianapolis Colts on Oct 29, 2010 21:54:20 GMT -5
I am going to have to Veto as well. A Backup, a medicore at best LB, and a shifty Rookie QB for a soon to be studly RB = ;o
|
|
|
Post by houstontexans on Oct 29, 2010 22:53:40 GMT -5
i dont usually make big deals out of trades, but i feel like this one needs a bit more of an explanation. i think that this trade is more than fair, moreno has a bit of a nice contract, but packers gets a solid LB in Goff, averaging only one less point than moreno alone, and on top of that max hall is a starting quarterback, and eric is addressing his need at QB with this move. taylor isnt exactly the ideal running back to get in return for a low end #1, but in such a deep league like this he is worth starting. at first glance i liked erics side.. approve.
|
|
|
Post by sdchargers on Oct 29, 2010 23:25:30 GMT -5
There is nothing sadder than a guy who likes to veto a fair amount prefacing his trade, not with an explanation of the deal, but with a preemptive defense against people who will veto it because he knows it's a bullshit deal. I don't buy into Moreno at all. I don't think he's that talented. But he's the clear number one in a good running system. Chester Taylor is old and bad, but he was just named their official goal line back (though it seems like he always has been), but I do not expect a jump in points. Goff is a mediocre fantasy LB. Max Hall is truly horrible. But, as of right now, he's a starting QB in the NFL, which is valuable in this league.
Normally I'd approve this solely based on the fact that Hall is a starting QB. This is a bad deal even though I think Moreno is fool's gold. Like I said, I normally would approve this deal, but John's statement, "I got what I want, he got what he wants, that is the point of a trade correct?" is so disgusting and insincere and pathetic that I can't approve of this. Grow a pair, John. Either don't veto other people's deals and actually live by those words, or have the integrity to not post deals that you, yourself, would veto. It's pathetic. A real explanation of the deal in the beginning and you'd have my approval, don't be manipulative and expect people to act differently than you would.
That being said, I'm not going to go as far as to veto for moralistic reasons. Just wanted to get my two cents in.
Abstain.
|
|
|
Post by kenton on Oct 30, 2010 6:59:32 GMT -5
Veto bad for eric
|
|
miamidolphins
Average Joe
League Moderator
Miami Dolphins 2011!
Posts: 2,069
|
Post by miamidolphins on Oct 30, 2010 7:45:20 GMT -5
Know the situation, this does NOT warrant a veto. WOW
|
|