|
|
Post by forty on Nov 13, 2010 12:08:24 GMT -5
Chicago Bears Trade:
Darren Sproles - $7.283 M (2010)
SF Trade:
4rth round pick (NYJ)
5th round pick (MIA)
5th round pick (SF)
|
|
|
|
Post by kingjussbears on Nov 13, 2010 12:10:42 GMT -5
ok i did this because im in rebuild mode
|
|
|
|
Post by marioskazbah on Nov 13, 2010 13:16:05 GMT -5
God damnit, why did you make that awful schaub trade with the Jags if you hated all the players you got in return? Coming up soon will be you getting a 5th for RoyWill, and that would be a better deal than this one. This is how teams die, a guy in "rebuild" mode thinking something like this is a good idea. Approved but wouldnt you feel a little more comfortable in some sort of diet soderberg league?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kansas on Nov 13, 2010 17:01:10 GMT -5
No fucking chance.
VETO.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC634~Jaguars on Nov 13, 2010 17:07:39 GMT -5
Justin...taking 5th rounders isnt rebuilding...you will end up dropping those guys anyways(most likely)...pretty horrible deal...
Veto
|
|
|
|
Post by houstontexans on Nov 13, 2010 18:36:18 GMT -5
approve. sproles is a backup and is a 2010. yeah he's getting crap in return but sproles is a backup RB and with only a few weeks left of him and Justin not going to the playoffs i dont see anything wrong with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by erok11 on Nov 13, 2010 20:50:40 GMT -5
veto....that is pretty bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Nov 13, 2010 21:25:14 GMT -5
VETO, HORRIBLE
|
|
|
|
Post by sdchargers on Nov 14, 2010 8:18:35 GMT -5
C'mon jack, let he who is without sin and all that bullshit. Not a good deal, but not at all vetoable in my mind. Sproles has a few weeks of mediocrity left and Justin has a small chance at getting lucky with a late pick.
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Nov 14, 2010 10:28:50 GMT -5
lol Liam its not like i was the only one to veto, Sproles is worth more then late picks
|
|
|
|
Post by blacksunshine3006 on Nov 14, 2010 15:32:10 GMT -5
Veto
|
|
|
|
Post by marioskazbah on Nov 14, 2010 16:24:33 GMT -5
Jack, hes not saying you were the only one to veto, hes suggesting that you make terrible terrible trades and therefore shouldnt really tell other people what to do with their teams, look at your team for christs sakes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 14, 2010 22:45:01 GMT -5
veto
|
|
|
|
Post by dylan on Nov 15, 2010 15:23:26 GMT -5
Approved. Why veto? Sproles will be an FA in a few weeks.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC634~Jaguars on Nov 15, 2010 16:36:32 GMT -5
Its already been vetoed...
|
|
