NE/SD/SF

[Jack]

New England Trades:
TE: Jermaine Gresham
2012: $690,250, 2013: $975,500, 2014: $1,260,750
(R)DL: Drake Nevis - $645,000 (2014)

San Francisco Trades:
TE: Antonio Gates 5.2M 2015

San Diego Trades:
WR: Brian Quick TBD
Bench: [CB] Jacob Lacey .3m 2013 TB

New England Receives:
WR: Brian Quick
Bench: [CB] Jacob Lacey .3m 2013 TB

San Diego Receives:
TE: Antonio Gates 5.2M 2015

San Francisco Receives:
TE: Jermaine Gresham
2012: $690,250, 2013: $975,500, 2014: $1,260,750
(R)DL: Drake Nevis - $645,000 (2014)

Accept, same reasoning, Quick can be a stud.

[sdchargers]

I accept. I know this is an overpay for Quick. But I like him a lot and Jack was very persistent. So He won't move for less than this. I understand if people veto, I wouldn't have an issue with that. But Jack won't get Quick if not for in this deal. So you can take that into account or not. You know, roll to the goal or some shit.

[Jack]

For viewers interest, i took out the pick and got Jacob Lacey back.

[Smurphy]

Veto .... sorry lacey is terrible this is the same deal as before

[Jack]

It isn't can you read above?

[DC634~Jaguars]

Chill the fuck out Jack...

In all seriousness, this is simply not a fair trade and the Pats are bad enough as it is...I feel bad for vetoing this for Smooth, because I actually like his side of the deal a lot, but not so much for the other 2 cuz one gets away with rape, the other gets raped...

Veto

[Kansas]

I didnt like the first attempt at this one and I really dont like this one much either. Its a 3 way that 1 team really gets the upper hand in IMO.

Gates when healthy will score higher than top 10 WRs. We seen that in 2010 and even with 6 weeks missed he was still a top 10 TE.

I think SF gets the shortend and SD wins here. In a reworked trade Id expect that to change.

Veto.